ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Male infertility may be secondary to male genital tract infection (MGTI) in an estimated 15% of cases. In the absence of overt clinical signs, evaluation for MGTI beyond semen analysis is not well established. Therefore, we review the literature on the evaluation and management of MGTI in the setting of male infertility. RECENT FINDINGS: A set of international guidelines recommends semen culture and PCR testing, but the significance of positive results remains unclear. Clinical trials evaluating anti-inflammatory or antibiotic treatment report improvements in sperm parameters and leukocytospermia, but data on the effect on conception rates are lacking. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) have been associated with poor semen parameters and decreased conception rates. SUMMARY: The finding of leukocytospermia on semen analysis prompts further evaluation for MGTI, including focused physical examination. The role of routine semen culture is controversial. Treatment options include anti-inflammatories; frequent ejaculation; and antibiotics, which should not be used in the absence of symptoms or microbiological infection. SARS-CoV-2 represents a subacute threat to fertility that should be screened for in the reproductive history along with HPV and other viruses.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Genital Diseases, Male , Infertility, Male , Papillomavirus Infections , Reproductive Tract Infections , Female , Male , Humans , Reproductive Tract Infections/diagnosis , Reproductive Tract Infections/drug therapy , Semen/microbiology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/etiology , Infertility, Male/therapy , Genital Diseases, Male/diagnosis , Genital Diseases, Male/drug therapy , SpermatozoaABSTRACT
Viral infections are a common cause of morbidity worldwide. The emergence of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to more attention to viral infections and finding novel therapeutics. The CRISPR-Cas9 system has been recently proposed as a potential therapeutic tool for the treatment of viral diseases. Here, we review the research progress in the use of CRISPR-Cas technology for treating viral infections, as well as the strategies for improving the delivery of this gene-editing tool in vivo. Key challenges that hinder the widespread clinical application of CRISPR-Cas9 technology are also discussed, and several possible directions for future research are proposed.
Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing/methods , Genetic Therapy/methods , Virus Diseases/therapy , COVID-19/therapy , Genome, Viral , HIV Infections/therapy , Hepatitis B/therapy , Herpesviridae Infections/therapy , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
In 2014 and 2021, two nucleic-acid vaccine candidates named MAV E2 and VGX-3100 completed phase III clinical trials in Mexico and U.S., respectively, for patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These well-tolerated but still unlicensed vaccines encode distinct HPV antigens (E2 versus E6+E7) to elicit cell-mediated immune responses; their clinical efficacy, as measured by HSIL regression or cure, was modest when compared with placebo or surgery (conization), but both proved highly effective in clearing HPV infection, which should help further optimize strategies for enhancing vaccine immunogenicity, toward an ultimate goal of preventing malignancies in millions of patients who are living with persistent, oncogenic HPV infection but are not expected to benefit from current, prophylactic vaccines. The major roadblocks to a highly efficacious and practical product remain challenging and can be classified into five categories: (i) getting the vaccines into the right cells for efficient expression and presentation of HPV antigens (fusion proteins or epitopes); (ii) having adequate coverage of oncogenic HPV types, beyond the current focus on HPV-16 and -18; (iii) directing immune protection to various epithelial niches, especially anogenital mucosa and upper aerodigestive tract where HPV-transformed cells wreak havoc; (iv) establishing the time window and vaccination regimen, including dosage, interval and even combination therapy, for achieving maximum efficacy; and (v) validating therapeutic efficacy in patients with poor prognosis because of advanced, recurrent or non-resectable malignancies. Overall, the room for improvements is still large enough that continuing efforts for research and development will very likely extend into the next decade.